The attachment of the sign of the economic to every spontaneous
insurrection under the sun is a commonplace in the Marxist tradition.
For Baudrillard, bursts of revolutionary activity governed by the
“pleasure principle” and the “radicality of revolt”—such as that
witnessed in “the destruction of machines, in pre-Marxist, utopian and
libertarian discourse as well as in the ideas sustaining ‘the cursed
poets or the sexual revolt”—sought a new and more radical “total
symbolic configuration of life.” But under the spell of Marxism, these
strands of rebellion are abstracted out of movements in political
economy, and, at worst, sacrificed as less important moments of the
unfolding of history through the “development of productive forces.” It
is this sense of finality from which revolutionary activity must escape,
of some end toward which our efforts are driven. The “here and now” of
revolution must be reinstated. Against the “imposition” of the meaning
of revolutionary finality, Baudrillard instead celebrates “the
radicality of desire which, in its non-meaning, cuts through all
finality”
No comments:
Post a Comment